Re: Oxford City (A) FA Cup - 5th October 18
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2018 10:48 am
I've steered clear of this theme for a while as my only brush with DFC these days is on the forum as I can't get to the games. But I'll weigh in a little now.
Tony Burman did a great job as Darts manager, and achieved some real success, but the last few years were not entirely comfy and as kentc states, the decisions around the strikers last year were terrible - you should never drop a striker who is on fire in favor of a newbie who may or may not score. However, at the end of the day, TB resigned. You cannot blame the fans for that, and we had to start afresh.
Here lies my rub. The board had the option of advertising and interviewing for a good manager in order to keep us looking to move up the ladder. Or they could revert to a 'safe' option quoting connections with the club and some sort of DFC ethos. When we annouced the current management duo, I was not at all happy. There seemed to have been no effort to find the best option, or advertise, and the chosen managers had a CV that really beggared the question 'what exactly qualifies these two as the best option for the club?' Sadly that question appears to be being answered by huge doubts over every aspect - recruitment, tactics and all manner of problems arising. I see the Welling fans were equally stupefied by our decision. So why did the board see this as a logical appointment - what did these guys do previously to warrant the appointment. There's a word for these appointments, cronyism. They appear to be jobs for mates or aquaintances. and that is not good enough.
Now we have blown a run in the cup away, but we are stuck with a poor squad with additional loanees. Maybe time to consider getting a decent manager in? Or would a sacking involve another dartford oldie pitching up with no attempt to interview alternatives.
I avoided posting all this before as I wanted to give the new guys time, but to me this was coming since they arrived, and the people who organised this management team should maybe absent themselves from future decisions as this is a ship wreck to be honest. As was posted above, instead of evolution, we have revolution, and the worst type possible.
Tony Burman did a great job as Darts manager, and achieved some real success, but the last few years were not entirely comfy and as kentc states, the decisions around the strikers last year were terrible - you should never drop a striker who is on fire in favor of a newbie who may or may not score. However, at the end of the day, TB resigned. You cannot blame the fans for that, and we had to start afresh.
Here lies my rub. The board had the option of advertising and interviewing for a good manager in order to keep us looking to move up the ladder. Or they could revert to a 'safe' option quoting connections with the club and some sort of DFC ethos. When we annouced the current management duo, I was not at all happy. There seemed to have been no effort to find the best option, or advertise, and the chosen managers had a CV that really beggared the question 'what exactly qualifies these two as the best option for the club?' Sadly that question appears to be being answered by huge doubts over every aspect - recruitment, tactics and all manner of problems arising. I see the Welling fans were equally stupefied by our decision. So why did the board see this as a logical appointment - what did these guys do previously to warrant the appointment. There's a word for these appointments, cronyism. They appear to be jobs for mates or aquaintances. and that is not good enough.
Now we have blown a run in the cup away, but we are stuck with a poor squad with additional loanees. Maybe time to consider getting a decent manager in? Or would a sacking involve another dartford oldie pitching up with no attempt to interview alternatives.
I avoided posting all this before as I wanted to give the new guys time, but to me this was coming since they arrived, and the people who organised this management team should maybe absent themselves from future decisions as this is a ship wreck to be honest. As was posted above, instead of evolution, we have revolution, and the worst type possible.